Measuring the Impact of Pupil Premium Grant Spending 2014/15
Key Stage 1
The table below shows the percentage of pupils achieving Level 2b+ at the end of KS1 in 2014. The gap between pupils entitled to Pupil Premium and those who are not has narrowed between 2012 and 2014.
The table below shows the percentage of pupils achieving Level 2b+ at the end of KS1 in 2014. The gap between pupils entitled to Pupil Premium and those who are not has narrowed between 2012 and 2014.
End of KS1
Level 2+ |
Pupil Premium | Non Pupil Premium |
Reading | 78% | 50% (national 86%) |
Writing | 70% | 0% (national 77%) |
Maths | 74% | 50% (national 85%) |
The disadvantaged group attainment better than the non-disadvantaged group in reading, writing and maths.
Key Stage 2
The table below shows the percentage of pupils at the end of KS2 who achieved Level 4 or above. The gap in attainment between pupils entitled to Pupil Premium and those who are not has been inconsistent between 2012 and 2014.
End of KS2
Level 4+ |
Pupil Premium | Non Pupil Premium |
Reading | 84% | 78% (national 92%) |
Writing | 93% | 100% (national 90%) |
Maths | 86% | 100% (national 90%) |
Reading, Writing and Maths combined | 72% | 78% (national 85%) |
The disadvantaged group attained better than the non-disadvantaged group in reading, but less well in writing and in maths.
Progress of Edward Wilson Primary pupils compared to pupils nationally
Expected progress – 2 levels | EWP Pupil Premium pupils | National Pupil Premium pupils | EWP non-Pupil Premium pupils | National non-Pupil Premium pupils |
Reading | 90% | 88% | 89% | 92% |
Writing | 100% | 92% | 100% | 95% |
Maths | 98% | 86% | 100% | 91% |
The disadvantaged group made greater progress than the non-disadvantaged in reading, and in-line progress in writing and maths. Disadvantaged pupils at Edward Wilson Primary School made greater progress than Disadvantage pupils nationally, especially in writing and maths.